Research Reveals Only a Small Percentage of Informed Traders Drive Prediction Market Accuracy
A recent scandal involving a Green Beret arrested for betting on a classified U.S. raid may be more than an isolated incident, according to a new study. The research suggests that this individual may be an extreme example of the small group of informed traders who actually influence prices on platforms like Polymarket, while the majority of participants incur losses. The study, conducted by researchers from London Business School and Yale, analyzed 1.72 million accounts and $13.76 billion in trading volume on Polymarket from 2023 to 2025. The findings indicate that a mere 3% of traders are responsible for the majority of price discovery, consistently predicting outcomes and moving prices in the correct direction. In contrast, the remaining 97% of traders primarily provide liquidity and generate volume, but ultimately end up on the losing side of trades against the informed minority. To distinguish between skill and luck, the researchers simulated each trader's bets 10,000 times, using the same markets, moments, and dollar amounts, but with the direction of the bet determined by a coin flip. The results showed that only 12% of the biggest winners by raw profit consistently outperformed the benchmark, while many apparent winners did not sustain their performance over time. The study also found that the activity of skilled traders improves market accuracy, particularly in the final stages before resolution, and that they are the first to react to new information, such as Federal Reserve announcements or corporate earnings. However, the same edge that makes skilled traders valuable to price discovery raises concerns when they may be trading on non-public information. The researchers highlight the risk of insider trading, citing a concrete example involving the U.S. removal of Nicolás Maduro from power in Venezuela. In the days leading up to the operation, three newly created Polymarket accounts placed unusually large bets on a contract asking whether Maduro would be removed, collectively making over $630,000 when the raid occurred. While there is no evidence of wrongdoing in this case, the study suggests that insider trades, when they occur, can have a significant impact on prices. Ultimately, the findings challenge the notion that prediction markets work due to the collective knowledge of their participants, instead suggesting that they are driven by the actions of a small group of informed traders.