Aave Faces $6 Billion Deposit Exodus Following Kelp Hack, Exposing DeFi Lender's Structural Vulnerabilities

Aave has experienced a massive exodus of $6.6 billion in deposits, but it's not due to a direct hack on the platform. The total value locked in the protocol plummeted from $26.4 billion on April 18 to approximately $20 billion by Sunday morning, according to DefiLlama. The AAVE token saw a 16% decline to $92, while daily fees surged to $1.99 million as liquidations swept through the weekend. Depositors are fleeing because Aave is shouldering a burden it didn't create. When attackers siphoned off 116,500 rsETH from Kelp's bridge on Saturday, they used the stolen tokens as collateral on Aave V3 to borrow wrapped ether. On-chain trackers estimate that Aave's borrow amount is around $196 million, with total positions across Aave, Compound, and Euler reaching $236 million. As the largest lending protocol in DeFi, Aave allows users to deposit crypto to earn yield, while others borrow against collateral. Kelp, a liquid restaking protocol, takes ether that has already been staked on Ethereum and channels it through a separate yield-generating system called EigenLayer, issuing a receipt token, rsETH, in exchange. This rsETH is what users trade and, crucially, what some users posted as collateral on Aave to borrow against. On Saturday, attackers deceived Kelp's cross-chain bridge into releasing 116,500 rsETH, worth approximately $292 million, to an address under their control. They then deposited the stolen rsETH onto Aave V3 as collateral and borrowed wrapped ether against it. A bridge is a blockchain-based tool that facilitates token transfers between networks that may not originally support them. Initially, Aave stated that the Umbrella reserve would cover any deficit, but by Saturday afternoon, the language had shifted to 'exploring paths to offset the deficit.' The concentration of the damage is due to Aave's loan book spanning 22 chains, with Ethereum alone holding $14.24 billion of the $17.82 billion in outstanding borrows. WETH accounts for 39.49% of all loans on the protocol, meaning the attack targeted the exact collateral-to-WETH pair that dominates Aave's book. Stani Kulechov, Aave's founder, emphasized that the exploit was external and the protocol's contracts were not compromised. However, Aave accepted a liquid restaking token as collateral, and the token's backing vanished on a bridge Aave does not control, leaving depositors vulnerable to losses. Liquid restaking tokens were whitelisted across major lending protocols due to their yield and representation of a growing share of Ethereum's locked value. Risk models priced them as if they would maintain their peg under normal conditions, but none accounted for a scenario where the collateral would become worthless due to a bridge exploit on a chain Aave doesn't control. Trader Altcoin Sherpa wrote on X, 'AAVE is the backbone of DeFi, with billions invested, and nearly every new DeFi infrastructure on new chains is a fork of it. When AAVE faces contagion risk, it exposes the fragility of the entire system.' The token price is now reflecting the question of whether the Umbrella reserve is sufficient to cover the shortfall and whether stkAAVE holders who back that reserve will absorb the loss.