Aave Faces $6 Billion Deposit Exodus After Kelp Hack Exposes DeFi Vulnerabilities

Aave has witnessed a massive exodus of $6.6 billion in deposits, but this time it's not due to a direct hack on the platform. The protocol's total value locked plummeted from $26.4 billion on April 18 to approximately $20 billion by Sunday morning, according to DefiLlama. The AAVE token suffered a 16% decline to $92, while daily fees surged to $1.99 million amidst a wave of liquidations over the weekend. Depositors are fleeing because Aave is now carrying a significant liability it didn't create. When attackers drained 116,500 rsETH from Kelp's bridge on Saturday, they used the stolen tokens as collateral on Aave V3 to borrow wrapped ether. On-chain trackers estimate the Aave-specific borrow to be around $196 million, with total positions across Aave, Compound, and Euler totaling approximately $236 million. Aave, the largest lending protocol in DeFi, allows users to deposit crypto to earn yield, while others borrow against collateral. Kelp, a liquid restaking protocol, takes already-staked ether on Ethereum and routes it through EigenLayer, issuing a receipt token called rsETH. This rsETH is what users trade and, crucially, what some users posted as collateral on Aave to borrow against. On Saturday, attackers tricked Kelp's cross-chain bridge into releasing 116,500 rsETH, worth around $292 million, to a controlled address. They then deposited the stolen rsETH onto Aave V3 as collateral and borrowed wrapped ether against it. Aave initially stated that the Umbrella reserve would cover any deficit but later softened its stance to exploring paths to offset the deficit. The concentration of the damage is due to Aave's loan book spanning 22 chains, with Ethereum alone holding $14.24 billion of the $17.82 billion in outstanding borrows. WETH accounts for 39.49% of all loans on the protocol, meaning the attack targeted the exact collateral-to-WETH pair that dominates Aave's book. Stani Kulechov, Aave's founder, emphasized that the exploit was external and the protocol's contracts were not compromised. However, Aave accepted a liquid restaking token as collateral, and that token's backing vanished on a bridge Aave doesn't control, leaving depositors vulnerable to losses. Liquid restaking tokens were whitelisted across major lending protocols due to their yield and growing share of Ethereum's locked value. Risk models priced them as if they would maintain their peg under normal conditions, but none accounted for a scenario where the collateral becomes worthless due to a bridge exploit on an unrelated chain. The token price is now reflecting the uncertainty over whether Umbrella is sufficient to cover the hole and whether stkAAVE holders backing that reserve will absorb the loss.