Aave Faces $6 Billion Deposit Exodus After Kelp Hack Exposes DeFi Vulnerabilities

Aave has witnessed a staggering $6.6 billion exit, and it's not due to a direct hack on the platform. The protocol's total value locked plummeted from $26.4 billion on April 18 to approximately $20 billion by Sunday morning, according to DefiLlama. The AAVE token suffered a 16% decline to $92, while daily fees surged to $1.99 million as liquidations swept through the weekend. Depositors are fleeing because Aave is shouldering a burden it didn't create. When attackers siphoned off 116,500 rsETH from Kelp's bridge on Saturday, they utilized the stolen tokens as collateral on Aave V3 to borrow wrapped ether. On-chain trackers estimate the Aave-specific borrow to be around $196 million, with total positions across Aave, Compound, and Euler nearing $236 million. Aave, the largest lending protocol in DeFi, enables users to deposit crypto to earn yields, while others borrow against collateral. Kelp, a liquid restaking protocol, takes already-staked ether on Ethereum and channels it through a separate yield-generating system called EigenLayer, issuing a receipt token, rsETH, in exchange. That rsETH is what users trade and, crucially, what some users posted as collateral on Aave to borrow against. On Saturday, attackers deceived Kelp's cross-chain bridge into releasing 116,500 rsETH, worth approximately $292 million, to a controlled address. They then deposited the stolen rsETH onto Aave V3 as collateral and borrowed wrapped ether against it. Aave initially stated that the Umbrella reserve would cover any deficit, but by Saturday afternoon, the language had softened to 'exploring paths to offset the deficit.' The concentration of the damage is due to Aave's loan book spanning 22 chains, with Ethereum alone holding $14.24 billion of the $17.82 billion in outstanding borrows. WETH accounts for 39.49% of all loans on the protocol, meaning the attack targeted the exact collateral-to-WETH pair that dominates Aave's book. Stani Kulechov, Aave's founder, stated that the exploit was external and the protocol's contracts were not compromised. However, Aave accepted a liquid restaking token as collateral, and that token's backing vanished on a bridge Aave does not control, leaving depositors vulnerable to losses. Liquid restaking tokens were whitelisted across major lending protocols due to their yield and representation of Ethereum's locked value. Risk models priced them as if they would hold peg under normal conditions, but none accounted for a scenario where the collateral becomes worthless due to a bridge exploit on an unrelated chain. As trader Altcoin Sherpa noted on X, 'AAVE is the backbone of DeFi, with billions invested, and nearly every new DeFi infrastructure on new chains is a fork of it. When AAVE has contagion risk, it reveals the fragility of the entire system.' The token price is now attempting to determine whether Umbrella is sufficient to cover the deficit and whether stkAAVE holders who back that reserve will absorb the loss.