Former Solana Executive Utilizes Wall Street Strategy to Promote Fairness in DeFi
Austin Federa, the former head of strategy at the Solana Foundation, left his position in 2024 to address the perceived unfairness in the cryptocurrency trading environment. Eighteen months later, his company, DoubleZero, is now ready to launch its solution. The primary goal of DoubleZero is to eliminate the proximity to exchange servers as a competitive advantage for traders by utilizing a private fiber network. This network aims to reduce latency, which is the time it takes for an order to reach the platform from a trader's desk, and create a more equitable environment for all traders, despite the fact that regulators and traders are not currently demanding it. According to Federa, the issue lies in the fact that the cryptocurrency industry often confuses decentralization with distribution. Although DeFi protocols are decentralized due to their open-source code and permissionless validator sets, the laws of physics cause validators to cluster in the same data centers, which can result in milliseconds determining the outcome of a trade. For instance, on platforms like Hyperliquid, traders based in Tokyo have a roughly 200-millisecond advantage over their international competitors. Federa stated in an interview with CoinDesk, 'Hyperliquid may be decentralized from a governance and user perspective, but it is not a distributed system. It is still co-located in the same environment, even if it's run by multiple different entities.' This issue is not new, as traditional finance has already faced similar challenges. The New York Stock Exchange developed its Mahwah, New Jersey data center over a decade ago and implemented cable-length equalization to within a nanosecond, not because regulators required it, but because asymmetric access was detrimental to business. Simply put, traders who felt disadvantaged would route their orders elsewhere. DoubleZero's solution involves timestamping. The network aggregates private bandwidth from operators to route blockchain data over dedicated links, while providing venues with tools to timestamp orders across global entry points and reconstruct a fair sequence, similar to the cable equalization used by the NYSE. The challenge is not only about speed but also about verifiability. On a venue running over the public internet, a trader whose order arrives late has no way to distinguish ordinary network congestion from something more deliberate. Federa explained, 'Is that true because the public internet drops packets all the time, or is that true because you saw my transaction and said, 'Hey, this guy's pretty good, I don't want to include this block'? The counter-factual is really hard to prove.' DoubleZero's pitch is that a managed network with deterministic latency makes that distinction provable. Although physics still applies, and a New York trading desk routing through DoubleZero to reach Hyperliquid in Tokyo will not outrun a nearer competitor in AWS's ap-northeast-1 region, the gap and variance shrink. Traders get not just lower latency but predictable latency, which is the property high-frequency trading firms actually pay for in traditional markets. Federa's broader point is that the cryptocurrency industry is misinterpreting what makes traditional markets fair. Regulators are important, but they are not the primary drivers. FINRA, the body that polices most of Wall Street's day-to-day conduct, is technically a voluntary self-regulatory organization. The Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission serve as backstops with enforcement teeth, but the day-to-day work of keeping markets fair is done by exchanges themselves. They do it because their business depends on it. Venues that get a reputation for asymmetric access lose volume to venues that don't. If Federa is correct, DeFi's latency problem is not waiting on regulators; it's waiting on the moment a major venue decides fairness is a competitive advantage worth paying for. The cryptocurrency industry has spent a decade proving that decentralized systems can be built. The next decade will test whether anyone wants to build distributed ones, where the advantage isn't based on the location of the server in Tokyo. As Federa stated, 'No one wants to trade on an unfair platform.'